OptiMesh®

Conforms to You

The only conforming, patient specific expandable implant on the market, OptiMesh is delivered through one of the smallest insertion profiles, dynamically conforms to a patient’s unique endplate morphology, and powerfully expands to one of the largest implant footprints available.*

OptiMesh, featuring Conform and Expand technology, is designed to provide a custom anatomical fit for lumbar fusion surgical patients.

Natural Restoration and Expansion Power

OptiMesh’s powerful distraction forces and conformance to the endplates provide strength and stability to restore disc height, achieve alignment goals, and promote a robust fusion.1

Efficient Delivery of Biologics

With nearly the entire implant comprised of biologics, OptiMesh offers a comprehensive fusion scaffold and provides one of the most efficient ways to deliver biologics to the spine. Backed with IDE level data, this is an implant category of its own.

Effecient Delivery of Biologics

OptiMesh

Unparalleled Versatility

Open

TLIF/PLIF

MIS

TLIF

Ultra-MIS

OptiLIF®

Ultra-MIS

OptiLIF® Endo

A single implant may be used for multiple lumbar fusion approaches accommodating patient specific needs. No matter your approach to lumbar fusion, OptiMesh provides a best in class expandable interbody solution from Open, MIS TLIF, ultra-MIS (OptiLIF), to endoscopic fusion (OptiLIF Endo) applications.

OptiMesh OptiLIF Procedure

Ultra-Minimally Invasive Delivery, Maximal Patient Outcomes

OptiMesh’s ultra-minimally invasive delivery is designed to provide patients with the benefits of MIS surgery through a reproducible, efficient procedure, without sacrificing, but maximizing footprint coverage. Published clinical results show improved patient outcomes, such as:

  • Shorter hospital stays1
  • Higher post-operative patient satisfaction2
  • Faster return to work2
  • Reduced use of narcotics over time2

[1] Lavoie S, Bydon M, Nunley P, Sandhu F, Shore J, Stone M. Does indirect decompression vs open decompression in percutaneous interbody fusion provide better results? An ad-hoc analysis of a prospective multi-center percutaneous interbody fusion study. International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery (ISASS) Annual Conference 2021. Miami, FL. 2021 May 13-15.

[2] Chi J, Nunley P, et al. Two-Year Outcomes From a Prospective Multicenter Investigation Device Trial of a Novel Conformal Mesh Interbody Fusion Device. Int J Spine Surg. 2021 Dec; 15(6): 1103-1114.

* Data on file

Unmatched Clinical Experience

The SCOUT IDE Study

Unique in design and in published data, OptiMesh holds the highest achievement in clinical validation with an IDE De Novo level grant. Spineology Clinical Outcomes Trial (SCOUT Study): IDE trial of a novel, conformable device placed in the disc space through a small portal and filled with bone graft in-situ. At 24 months:

  • 92% patients rated satisfaction as excellent/good
  • Mean ODI improved 32.0 ± 18.5
  • 90% (95/96) fusion

0%

98% fusion at 12 months post-op, evaluated by two independent radiologists.

0%

Patients experienced on average, a 67% reduction in back pain at 3 months.

0%

51% of patients on average experienced an improvement in back function by month 3 post-op.

0%

92% of patients rated their satisfaction "excellent" or "good" at 6 months.

There were no device-related serious adverse events.

Chi J, Nunley P, et al. Two-Year Outcomes From a Prospective Multicenter Investigation Device Trial of a Novel Conformal Mesh Interbody Fusion Device. Int J Spine Surg. 2021 Dec; 15(6): 1103-1114.

Whitepapers@4x

Unique in Data

20 Clinical Publications

> 50,000 implants

Additionally, 20+ years of clinical experience, 20 clinical publications, and > 50,000 devices implanted set OptiMesh alone in the interbody fusion space.

A Game Changer

Samuel A. Joseph, Jr MD

"This is a revolutionary technique that helps patients get back to their lives incredibly fast. There is nothing out there as effective and powerful as Spineology’s OptiMesh."

Founder  & CEO of Joseph Spine Institute

Medical Director of Spine Surgery, South Tampa Hospital

Tampa Bay Buccaneers Team Spine Surgeon

Betsy H. Grunch, MD, FAANS, FACS, Neurosurgery

Betsy H. Grunch, MD, FAANS, FACS, Neurosurgery

The Longstreet Clinic, GA

“Learning this approach and implant was one of the simplest procedures compared to an anterior or lateral approach. It is a very simple approach that is very consistent and can give you optimal results every single time.”

Dr hafez

Daniel M. Hafez, MD, PhD

Assistant Professor of Neurosurgery, Associate Program Director
Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis

"The most intriguing aspect of Spineology is the fact the implant itself is the biologic. As we push the envelope in MIS, we are asking more out of our implants and biologics to improve the fusion success. In this case, the implant is the biologic, and therefore the full surface area has fusion potential."

Dr_Stephane_Lavoie

Stephane Lavoie, MD

Florida Orthopedic Associates

“OptiMesh has been a transformation… as I used it more and more I was able to integrate it into my practice on a daily basis now. To me the biggest advantage is the large footprint that you end up having at the end of my surgery without having to have a large exposure, it truly is a minimally invasive technique that I use that only OptiMesh can provide at this point in time. I feel that any patient with an interbody fusion can benefit from this.”

dr park

Charles Park, MD

Mercy Medical Center, Neurosurgeon

“The proprietary OptiMesh instrumentation makes this procedure extremely efficient and reproducible. This anatomy sparing technique preserves supportive structures of spine and is performed in the most minimally invasive fashion. That’s a huge benefit to me and to my patients.”

michael-wang

Michael Y. Wang, MD, MBA, FAANS

Professor, Neurological Surgery & Rehab Medicine
Spine Fellowship Director Chief of Neurosurgery, University of Miami Hospital
University of Miami Miller School of Medicine

“The most differentiating aspect of the OptiMesh product is that unlike most other expandable products it can conform to the space, it can access through the smallest space, and therefore adapts to the human body. That offers some big advantages when you are dealing with irregularities or asymmetries.”

timmy wang md

Timothy Wang, MD

Assistant Professor, Neurosurgery
Rush University Medical Group

“The biggest thing that OptiMesh offers is that you get the maximum footprint. Every single other posterior approach implant, no matter whether it expands in 2 dimensions, or three dimensions, there is nothing that can give you the same footprint as OptiMesh. You really need a larger footprint to balance out the force of your indirect decompression with the cage expansion… The only technology that has the ability to do that is the OptiMesh implant.”

Dr wells

Daniel Wells, MD

Tennessee Orthopaedic Alliance

"As a spine surgeon I’m always looking for a way to maximize patient outcomes while minimizing morbidity to the patient, and I believe OptiMesh provides a solid platform to accomplish these goals. Utilizing OptiMesh’s technique I’m able to get into disc spaces that I’d otherwise not be able to get into to insert an expandable cage. I utilize OptiMesh as my go-to interbody device- I essentially use it for anything that I would normally use for an ALIF, TLIF, or lateral interbody fusion.”

Woodward, Josha_24 1

Josha Woodward, MD

Assistant Professor, Neurosurgery
Oregon Health and Science University

“There is nothing else that can provide consistent access to a collapsed disc space other than OptiMesh. It is the best technological solution I’ve seen for MIS spine surgery."

Christopher Yeung, MD

Christopher Yeung, MD

Orthopedic Surgeon
Desert Institute for Spine Care, PHX AZ

“It’s one of the first personalized implants because it is totally conforming to the space it’s in. If it’s a scalloped endplate or a flat endplate it will adapt and conform to that, and there is a lot of bony apposition in support of the endplates.”

Scroll to Top